top of page

Iran, Hizbullah, Hamas and the Global Jihad

Summary

This document analyzes the complex relationships between Iran, Hizbullah, and Hamas, framing them within the context of a broader global jihadist movement. It explores the strategic implications for the West, the role of Iran in regional conflicts, and the challenges posed by these actors to the existing international order. It also delves into the ideological underpinnings of these groups and their impact on regional stability.

Top Questions and Answers

Q: What is the main argument of the document regarding the root cause of the conflict in the Middle East?
A: The document argues that the conflict in the Middle East does not stem primarily from Israel's occupation of Arab or Palestinian lands, but rather from a regional jihad led by Iran, enabled by Syria, and radical Islamist groups.


Q: How does the document describe Iran's strategy in the region?
A: The document describes Iran's strategy as seeking regional dominance through Arab Shiite communities, using groups like Hizbullah and Hamas as proxies, and challenging Western influence.


Q: What is the significance of the 'Shiite crescent' mentioned in the document?
A: The 'Shiite crescent' refers to an emerging sphere of influence starting in Iran, moving through Iraq and Syria, and reaching Lebanon, which is perceived by some Sunni Arab leaders as a threat to their power and regional stability.


Q: Does the document suggest that Sunni and Shiite groups never cooperate?
A: No, the document explicitly states that militant Sunni and Shiite groups may compete and even kill each other's operatives, but their potential cooperation should not be ruled out by analysts, citing examples of Iranian cooperation with Sunni radicals.


Q: What does the document say about the UN's role in the Middle East?
A: The document criticizes the UN's inability to halt regional deterioration, citing its failure to confront Iran over its nuclear program and its lack of action against Hizbullah.


Q: What is the document's view on the importance of defensible borders for Israel?
A: The document emphasizes the vital importance of defensible borders for Israel, particularly in the Jordan Valley, to prevent the deployment of weaponry and terrorist networks.


Q: How does the document describe the relationship between Iran and Hizbullah?
A: The document describes Hizbullah as Iran's proxy, used to project Iranian power and influence across the region, and as a terrorist arm of their respective foreign policies against Western regional interests.


Q: What is the document's assessment of the Palestinian Authority's ability to control terror groups?
A: The document suggests that the Palestinian Authority, particularly under Hamas, is weak and unable to neutralize local Islamic terror groups, and that this weakness is used to gain international support.


Q: According to the document, what is the ultimate objective of Iran?
A: The document states that Iran's ultimate objective is to leverage its regional control and, under the umbrella of a nuclear program, destabilize and ultimately subvert the international state system.


Q: What does the document say about the role of the Revolutionary Guards in Iran?
A: The document states that the Revolutionary Guards play a significant role in Iran, controlling the armed forces, and are involved in exporting Iranian terror, including training and financing groups like Hizbullah and Hamas.


Back to Library
bottom of page